Enaso Ene Parisue & 2 others v Joseph Bradley Waweru Gitari & 8 others [2020] eKLR Case Summary

Court
Environment and Land Court at Kajiado
Category
Civil
Judge(s)
Christine Ochieng
Judgment Date
October 08, 2020
Country
Kenya
Document Type
PDF
Number of Pages
3
Explore the Enaso Ene Parisue & 2 others v Joseph Bradley Waweru Gitari & 8 others [2020] eKLR case summary, analyzing key legal principles and outcomes relevant to the parties involved.

Case Brief: Enaso Ene Parisue & 2 others v Joseph Bradley Waweru Gitari & 8 others [2020] eKLR

1. Case Information:
- Name of the Case: Enaso Ene Parisue & Rotiken Ole Merit Oltokokoi v. Joseph Bradley Waweru Gitari & Langata Presbyterian Investment Ltd
- Case Number: ELC Case No. 27 of 2020
- Court: Environment and Land Court, Kajiado
- Date Delivered: October 8, 2020
- Category of Law: Civil
- Judge(s): Christine Ochieng
- Country: Kenya

2. Questions Presented:
The court must resolve several key issues:
- Whether the Plaintiffs should be granted leave to amend their Plaint.
- Whether the Defendants are entitled to orders of injunction against the Plaintiffs and others pending the outcome of the suit and counterclaim.
- Whether the court should review or vary its order made on June 23, 2020.
- Whether the 6th Defendant in the counterclaim should be restrained from registering further cautions or restrictions on the suit lands.
- Whether the 5th Defendant in the counterclaim should be struck off the suit.

3. Facts of the Case:
The Plaintiffs, Enaso Ene Parisue and Rotiken Ole Merit Oltokokoi, represent the estate of the deceased Oltokokoi Merit Katiyu. They are engaged in a legal dispute with the Defendants, Joseph Bradley Waweru Gitari and Langata Presbyterian Investment Ltd, over land parcel Kajiado/Kaputiei North/43967. The 1st Defendant claims to be the registered proprietor of the land, having purchased it from the 3rd and 4th Defendants, who were the administrators of the deceased's estate. The Plaintiffs assert that the title deeds issued to the Defendants were invalid following a court ruling that revoked a Certificate of Confirmation of Grant related to the estate.

4. Procedural History:
The case began with multiple applications from the Defendants for injunctions against the Plaintiffs, seeking to prevent them from interfering with the land. The Plaintiffs also filed an application to amend their pleadings and enjoin additional parties. The court reviewed the applications and the circumstances surrounding the ownership and occupation of the land, leading to a ruling on the various motions.

5. Analysis:
- Rules: The court considered Articles 22 and 23 of the Kenyan Constitution, the Environment and Land Court Act, and relevant Civil Procedure Rules regarding injunctions and amendments to pleadings.
- Case Law: The court referenced several precedents, including *Giella v. Cassman Brown Co. Ltd* (1973) which established the principles for granting injunctions, and *Mrao Ltd v. First American Bank of Kenya Ltd* (2003) which defined a prima facie case. These cases informed the court's analysis of whether the Defendants had established a legitimate claim to the land.
- Application: The court found that the Defendants had established a prima facie case, as they were the registered proprietors of the land and had followed proper legal procedures in their transactions. The Plaintiffs' actions of occupying the land without valid title were deemed unlawful, warranting the issuance of injunctions against them.

6. Conclusion:
The court ruled in favor of the Defendants, granting them injunctions against the Plaintiffs and allowing the Plaintiffs to amend their pleadings to include additional parties. The court upheld the validity of the Defendants' titles and denied the Plaintiffs' request to review the previous orders, emphasizing the importance of maintaining the status quo in property disputes.

7. Dissent:
No dissenting opinions were noted in the ruling, as the decision was unanimous in favor of the Defendants' applications.

8. Summary:
The court's ruling reinforced the principle of protecting registered property rights while allowing the Plaintiffs to amend their claims. This case highlights the complexities of land ownership disputes in Kenya, particularly involving deceased estates and the need for due process in property transactions. The outcome underscores the necessity for parties to ensure proper legal standing before occupying or altering land ownership claims.

Document Summary

Below is the summary preview of this document.

  • Enaso-Ene-Parisue--2-others-v-Joseph-Bradley-Waweru-Gitari--8-others-[2020]-eKLR-Case-Summary_1847_0.jpg

This is the end of the summary preview.

Related Documents

View all summaries